|
Hotel
SPAS: The Value May Not Be in The Profits
Written by
Rachel White, HVS International
During the
last development cycle, numerous full-service upscale hotels opened in
resort locations. Although these hotels varied in size, amenities offered,
and orientation, many of them had one commonality: a spa. Like irons,
ironing boards, and coffeemakers in mid-scale hotels, the spa became a
compulsory amenity at upscale lodging facilities. As upscale resort hotels
with spas sprang up, hoteliers and developers, not to be outdone by their
new competitors, created larger and more elaborate havens of health and
beauty in existing hotels as well, both in resort and urban settings. As
hotel developers and operators started building and running spas, in light
of limited market data and their limited experience in spa operations,
factors such as the impact on RevPAR, profitability, size of facility, and
amenities often went unexplored. Spas were considered necessary forms of
competitive defense. Now that the spa industry has evolved and spa
operations have stabilized, these questions can now be addressed.
What
makes a spa?
Visitors
to hotel spas know that no two spas are alike. The differences among
facilities are found not only in their individual ambience, but also in
the variety of amenities offered. Efforts are being made from different
segments of the industry to characterize and outline the spa trend. These
efforts will add to the credibility of the product being offered. However,
a strict definition of a spa’s components may not always be necessary.
Just as fitness rooms across the nation vary in their size and contents,
so do spas. As long as a guest is able to enjoy a workout in a
specifically designated area, no matter the size or facilities offered,
the hotel can advertise having a fitness center. If an urban hotel is
equipped with a fitness room, a swimming pool, and a few treatment rooms,
the hotel’s management may find it beneficial to label the facility a
spa if it meets the needs of the clientele. Obviously, the facility just
described differs greatly from a ±40,000-square-foot spa facility in a
resort setting that offers dozens of available treatments, but then,
hotels are unique in many ways. If it works for the property and if it
serves the needs of the guests, a hotel owner or manager may be justified
in labeling their facility a spa, whether or not it meets with an industry
definition.
When is
a spa profitable?
Determining
the profitability of a spa is a second challenge. Financial statements
that we see at HVS International show that, similar to food and beverage
facilities, most hotel spas are not treated as independent business units.
Rather, departmental expenses are subtracted to determine departmental
profitability but costs such as energy, maintenance, marketing, and the
like remain undistributed to the operating departments. Only when these
costs are allocated in the operating statements of the spa itself can it
be determined if the spa department is adding incremental net income to
the hotel’s bottom line. Health Fitness Dynamics, an independent spa
consulting firm, has created a uniform system of accounts for spa
facilities in order to assess them as independent business units. This
accounting system aids the spa operator in allocating undistributed and
fixed operating expenses to the spa’s operations and helps to clarify if
the property is generating profit as if it were a stand-alone business.
During the
initial influx of spa development, the expectation was that spas would
generate departmental profit before the allocation of undistributed and
fixed expenses ranging from 30% to 40% of departmental revenues. Now that
many hotel spa operations are stabilized, the opportunity has arisen to
determine if this is a realistic goal. A preliminary look at data from 20
hotel and resort properties evaluated or appraised by HVS in the past year
shows departmental profit ranging from 28.8% to less than 0.0%, prior to
the allocation of undistributed operating expenses and fixed expenses.
Though this data is inconclusive, it does indicate that spas may be less
profitable departmentally than what was originally anticipated to be the
case.
While it
appears that the operating performance of some hotel spas may fall short
of original expectations, the overall impact of a spa to a property’s
net income must be analyzed to get a true picture of whether a proposed
hotel spa will enhance property value and generate a return on investment.
Consider
the following example:
|
-
|
The
owner of a 300-room hotel adds a ±7,000-square-foot spa at a cost
of $400 per square foot, resulting in a total investment of
$2,800,000.
|
|
-
|
The
spa generates $125 in revenue per square foot, or $875,000 per
year.
|
|
-
|
The
spa’s departmental profit is 20%, or $175,000.
|
|
-
|
After
allocating undistributed operating expenses and fixed expenses,
the profit from the spa is $87,500 or 10% of departmental
revenues.
|
|
-
|
This
profit, capitalized at 10%, indicates that the value of the spa is
$875,000, nearly $2 million short of the development cost.
|
However,
add to the equation the impact that the spa’s presence has on the
hotel’s operations.
|
-
|
With
the spa amenity in place, the hotel’s occupancy increases from
68% to 70% and average rate from $240 to $250.
|
|
-
|
This
generates an additional $1,292,100 in room revenue
|
|
-
|
At
65% incremental profit, $839,865 is added to the hotel’s net
operating income.
|
|
-
|
This
amount capitalized at 10% yields a value of nearly $8.4 million.
|
In this
example, the value contributed by the hotel’s enhanced rooms revenue far
outweighs the value contributed by the spa’s departmental profit.
Intuition suggests that the above-inflationary rate growth in hotel and
resort properties in the past ten years has likely been partially
attributed to the addition or expansion of the spa component.
Thus,
while it is important to run any business efficiently, for hotel spas,
generating departmental profit may not be the principal objective. Though
investing money in amenities such as fresh fruit, fresh-cut flowers, or an
extra type of service may seem excessive, if these tokens enhance the spa
experience and increase RevPAR, they may be well worth it. If the presence
of a spa increases the property’s occupancy and/or average rate, the
contribution could more than make up for any potential departmental
losses. Alternatively, if adding the spa prevents loss in occupancy or
average rate to competitors, it can also be considered a worthwhile
investment.
In
general, it is believed that the presence of spas adds significantly to
the quality of lodging facilities. In the future, we can expect spas to
solidify their roles as fundamental components of upscale hotels. As the
hotel spa industry stabilizes, developers, operators, and analysts will
continue to explore the impact that spas have on the lodging facilities
they inhabit. Our ability to analyze and compare the spa industry will be
further enhanced as spas become more consistent in their offerings. Close
studies of operating revenues and expenses and the implementation of a
uniform system of accounts will likely enhance the operator’s ability to
control expenses and enhance departmental profitability. However, the
greatest impact that spas have on their respective hotels is likely to be
on overall room revenue enhancement as opposed to departmental
profitability.
Contact:
HVS
International
Rachel
White
Suite 620
116 New Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
415-896-0868
415-896-0516 FAX
Website:
http://www.hvsinternational.com
Top |